I received a new fact sheet from Break the Cycle, a national dating violence awareness organization, detailing the state of Virginia’s dating violence policies. The fact sheet, or report card, gave the State of Virginia a rating of “F” because of the lack of legislation that protects teens in violent and lethal relationships. I asked our Court Advocacy Program Coordinator, Jamie Friedman, what she thought about the rating and the current state policies as they relate to legal protections for teens in unhealthy and violent dating relationships.
“Good question Linda. This is an interesting and informative piece, but frankly, it is no surprise to me that VA received the lowest rating. There is certainly a huge gap in VA compared to other jurisdictions. As the report found, people who are dating have limited legal protection unless a couple has a child in common or they live together. If they don’t meet one of these two requirements, then there is no civil recourse for them. The only option left is going the criminal route. However, sadly and ironically, this is often not the safest option for someone in a violent and lethal relationship. Why?
Because, if they do decide to press criminal charges, the burden of proof to get warrants for an assault or stalking in a General District Court is very high, and often hard to prove, as VA code requires direct physical harm, explicit verbal threats, and even a specific “number of incidents” to warrant an arrest. It seems to me that our legislators are continuing to uphold laws that only ensure legal action once something truly harmful has happened to the survivor.
VA has taken some steps, but we have a lot of changes to make to ensure we are opening the doors for legal protections for all types of relationships. It is concerning to me that we are not moving forward with the times. In this day and age, couples are waiting longer and longer to move in together, get married, and have children. This makes the likelihood there will continue to be more and more people in abusive dating relationships being prohibited from seeking protection because they do not meet these strict relationship requirements or cannot demonstrate the steep “burden of proof.” This is particularly true of young and teen dating relationships.”
Interesting perspective from our Court Advocacy Program Coordinator. What do you think as a community we can do to provide options for youth and dating couples in our community?




Caroline Jones

